Just Click on Below Link To Download This Course:
DNP 825 WEEK 7 EPIDEMIOLOGY PAPER PART
THREE: IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION
Details:
The Epidemiology Paper is a practice immersion assignment
designed to be completed in three sections. This is part three of the assignment.
Learners are required to identify theories for implementation and evaluation of
prevention and health promotion activities for an at risk population.
General Guidelines:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of
the assignment:
- This assignment uses a rubric.
Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become
familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
- Doctoral learners are required to
use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is
located in the Student Success Center.
- This assignment requires that
support your position by referencing at least six to eight scholarly
resources. At least three of your supporting references must be from
scholarly sources other than the assigned readings.
- You are required to submit this
assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student
Success Center.
Directions:
This assignment comprises the third and final part of the
Epidemiology Paper. Write a 2,000-2,500 word paper that provides the following:
- Identify a public health theory you
will use to support the implementation of your prevention and health
promotion activities. Provide evidence that supports the use of this
theory within the program you designed.
- Design evidenced-based prevention
and health promotion activities that can be implemented to decrease the
health risk among your previously identified population.
- Identify the evaluation program you
will use to determine the efficacy of your health promotion activities and
in meeting the expected outcomes.
Portfolio Practice Hours:
Practice immersion assignments are based on your current course
objectives, and are intended to be application-based learning using your
real-world practice setting. These assignments earn practice immersion hours,
and are indicated in the assignment by a Portfolio Practice Hours statement
that reminds you, the learner, to enter a corresponding case log in
Typhon. Actual clock
hours are entered, but the average hours associated with
each practice immersion assignment is 10.
You are required to complete your assignment using real-world
application. Real-world application requires the use of evidence-based data,
contemporary theories, and concepts presented in the course. The culmination of
your assignment must present a viable application in a current practice
setting. For more information on parameters for practice immersion hours,
please refer to DNP resources in the DC Network.
To earn portfolio practice hours, enter the following after the
references section of your paper:
Practice Hours Completion Statement DNP-825
I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock
hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I have
also tracked said practice hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for
verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my
faculty and practice mentor.
Epidemiology Paper Part Three: Implementation and
Evaluation
|
|
1
Unsatisfactory 0.00% |
2
Less than Satisfactory 74.00% |
3
Satisfactory 79.00% |
4
Good 87.00% |
5
Excellent 100.00% |
|
|
70.0 %Content
|
|
|||||
|
5.0 %Completed Changes and
Corrected Errors to Subsequent Paper, Including Transitions for a Scholarly
Paper
|
Learner did not attach previous paper and
did not make changes as indicated.
|
N/A
|
Learner attached previous paper and has
made changes as indicated. Learner needs to incorporate transitions to
connect the ideas between the papers.
|
Learner attached previous paper and has
made changes as indicated. Learner needs to incorporate better transitions to
connect the ideas between the papers.
|
earner attached previous paper and has made
changes as indicated. Learner has includes all necessary transitions to
create a scholarly paper.
|
|
|
10.0 %Six to Eight Additional
Scholarly Research Sources With In-Text Citations
|
None of the required elements (minimum of
six topic-related scholarly research sources and six in-text citations) are
present.
|
Not all required elements are present. One
or more elements are missing and/or included sources are not scholarly
research or topic-related.
|
All required elements are present.
Scholarly research sources are topic-related, but the source and quality of
one or more references is questionable.
|
All required elements are present.
Scholarly research sources are topic-related and obtained from reputable
professional sources.
|
All required elements are present.
Scholarly research sources are topic-related and obtained from highly
respected, professional, original sources.
|
|
|
15.0 %Identifies the Public
Health/Health Promotion Theory That Was Used to Develop Health Prevention and
Promotion Activities. Provides Rationale for Why This Theory Was Used
|
Paper does not identify a public
health/health promotion theory to use in the development of health prevention
and promotion activities.
|
Paper identifies a public health/health
promotion theory to use in the development of health prevention and promotion
activities. Paper does not provide rationale for why the theory was used.
|
Paper identifies a public health/health
promotion theory to use in the development of health prevention and promotion
activities. Rationale for why the theory was used is weak or inconclusive.
|
Paper identifies a public health/health
promotion theory to use in the development of health prevention and promotion
activities. Paper provides good rationale for why the theory was used.
|
Paper identifies a public health/health
promotion theory to use in the development of health prevention and promotion
activities. Paper provides strong and insightful rationale for why the theory
was used.
|
|
|
20.0 %Provides Design and
Projected Implementation of Health Prevention and Promotion Activities.
Program Is Appropriate for Identified Population
|
Paper does not provide design or projected
implementation for health prevention and promotion activities; or, program is
inappropriate for identified population.
|
Paper provides basic design for health
prevention and promotion activities, but does not include projections for
implementation. Program does not directly relate to the identified
population.
|
Paper provides design for health prevention
and promotion activities and includes an outline for projected
implementation. Program is sufficient for identified population.
|
Paper provides design for health prevention
and promotion activities and includes projection for implementation. Program
is appropriate for identified population.
|
Paper provides well thought out design for
health prevention and promotion activities. Projection for implementation
uses foresight and includes significant detail. Program is well thought out
and appropriate for identified population.
|
|
|
20.0 %Program Evaluation to
Determine Efficacy (Aligns Public Health Components Essential to Nursing
Science; Demonstrates How These Components Are Essential to Effect
Improvement on Population Health)
|
Paper does not establish alignment of
public health components essential to nursing science.
|
Attempts to align public health components
essential to nursing science, but does not demonstrate how these components
are essential to effect improvement on population health.
|
Paper aligns some of the public health
components essential to nursing science and generally demonstrates how these
components are essential to effect improvement on population health.
|
Paper aligns public health components
essential to nursing science and demonstrates how these components are
essential to effect improvement on population health.
|
Paper establishes a clear and strong
alignment of public health components essential to nursing science.
Demonstration of how these components are essential to effect improvement on
population health is insightful and well supported.
|
|
|
20.0 %Organization and
Effectiveness
|
|
|||||
|
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
|
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose
or organizing claim.
|
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently
developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
|
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and
appropriate to purpose.
|
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and
forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of
the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
|
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive.
The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement
makes the purpose of the paper clear.
|
|
|
20.0 %Organization and
Effectiveness
|
|
|||||
|
8.0 %Argument Logic and
Construction
|
Statement of purpose is not justified by
the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
|
Sufficient justification of claims is
lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the
logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
|
Argument is orderly, but may have a few
inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims.
Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used
are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
|
Argument shows logical progressions.
Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
|
Clear and convincing argument that presents
a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
|
|
|
20.0 %Organization and
Effectiveness
|
|
|||||
|
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing
(includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
|
Surface errors are pervasive enough that
they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or
sentence construction are used.
|
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors
distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or
word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
|
Some mechanical errors or typos are
present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied
sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
|
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors,
although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective
sentence structures and figures of speech.
|
Writer is clearly in command of standard,
written, academic English.
|
|
|
10.0 %Format
|
|
|||||
|
5.0 %Paper Format (use of
appropriate style for the major and assignment)
|
Template is not used appropriately or
documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
|
Appropriate template is used, but some
elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is
apparent.
|
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is
correct, although some minor errors may be present.
|
Appropriate template is fully used. There
are virtually no errors in formatting style.
|
All format elements are correct.
|
|
|
10.0 %Format
|
|
|||||
|
5.0 %Research Citations
(in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page
listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)
|
No reference page is included. No citations
are used.
|
Reference page is present. Citations are
inconsistently used.
|
Reference page is included and lists
sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although
some errors may be present.
|
Reference page is present and fully
inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation
style is usually correct.
|
In-text citations and a reference page are
complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
|
|
|
100 %Total Weightage
|
|
|||||
Comments
Post a Comment